Paper detail

$\mathcal O(n)$ working precision inverses for symmetric tridiagonal Toeplitz matrices with $\mathcal O(1)$ floating point calculations

A well known numerical task is the inversion of large symmetric tridiagonal Toeplitz matrices, i.e., matrices whose entries equal $a$ on the diagonal and $b$ on the extra diagonals ($a, b\in \mathbb R$). The inverses of such matrices are dense and there exist well known explicit formulas by which they can be calculated in $\mathcal O(n^2)$. In this note we present a simplification of the problem that has proven to be rather useful in everyday practice: If $\vert a\vert > 2\vert b\vert$, that is, if the matrix is strictly diagonally dominant, its inverse is a band matrix to working precision and the bandwidth is independent of $n$ for sufficiently large $n$. Employing this observation, we construct a linear time algorithm for an explicit tridiagonal inversion that only uses $\mathcal O(1)$ floating point operations. On the basis of this simplified inversion algorithm we outline the cornerstones for an efficient parallelizable approximative equation solver.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.