Paper detail

Matching-Vector Families and LDCs Over Large Modulo

We prove new upper bounds on the size of families of vectors in $\Z_m^n$ with restricted modular inner products, when $m$ is a large integer. More formally, if $\vec{u}_1,\ldots,\vec{u}_t \in \Z_m^n$ and $\vec{v}_1,\ldots,\vec{v}_t \in \Z_m^n$ satisfy $\langle\vec{u}_i,\vec{v}_i\rangle\equiv0\pmod m$ and $\langle\vec{u}_i,\vec{v}_j\rangle\not\equiv0\pmod m$ for all $i\neq j\in[t]$, we prove that $t \leq O(m^{n/2+8.47})$. This improves a recent bound of $t \leq m^{n/2 + O(\log(m))}$ by \cite{BDL13} and is the best possible up to the constant 8.47 when $m$ is sufficiently larger than $n$. The maximal size of such families, called `Matching-Vector families', shows up in recent constructions of locally decodable error correcting codes (LDCs) and determines the rate of the code. Using our result we are able to show that these codes, called Matching-Vector codes, must have encoding length at least $K^{19/18}$ for $K$-bit messages, regardless of their query complexity. This improves a known super linear bound of $ K2^{Ω({\sqrt{\log K}})}$ proved in \cite{DGY11}.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.