Paper detail

Matching preclusion for vertex-transitive networks

In interconnection networks, matching preclusion is a measure of robustness when there is a link failure. Let $G$ be a graph of even order. The matching preclusion number $mp(G)$ is defined as the minimum number of edges whose deletion results in a subgraph without perfect matchings. Many interconnection networks are super matched, that is, their optimal matching preclusion sets are precisely those induced by a single vertex. In this paper, we obtain general results of vertex-transitive graphs including many known networks. A $k$-regular connected vertex-transitive graph has matching preclusion number $k$ and is super matched except for six classes of graphs. From this many previous results can be directly obtained and matching preclusion for some other networks, such as folded $k$-cubes, Hamming graphs and halved $k$-cubes, are derived.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.