Paper detail

Matching of Markov Databases Under Random Column Repetitions

Matching entries of correlated shuffled databases have practical applications ranging from privacy to biology. In this paper, motivated by synchronization errors in the sampling of time-indexed databases, matching of random databases under random column repetitions and deletions is investigated. It is assumed that for each entry (row) in the database, the attributes (columns) are correlated, which is modeled as a Markov process. Column histograms are proposed as a permutation-invariant feature to detect the repetition pattern, whose asymptotic-uniqueness is proved using information-theoretic tools. Repetition detection is then followed by a typicality-based row matching scheme. Considering this overall scheme, sufficient conditions for successful matching of databases in terms of the database growth rate are derived. A modified version of Fano's inequality leads to a tight necessary condition for successful matching, establishing the matching capacity under column repetitions. This capacity is equal to the erasure bound, which assumes the repetition locations are known a-priori. Overall, our results provide insights on privacy-preserving publication of anonymized time-indexed data.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.