Paper detail

Matching lattice QC+ED to Nature

The first step of any QFT calculation, aiming at phenomenological predictions, is the matching of the theory to Nature. The matching procedure fixes the parameters of the theory in terms of an equal number of external inputs that, if the theory is expected to reproduce observations, must be experimentally measured physical quantities. At the sub-percent level of accuracy QED radiative corrections become important and the theory expected to describe the hadronic Universe is QCD+QED. Phenomenological predictions deriving from lattice QCD calculations do depend, at this level of precision, upon the choice of the external inputs used to match/define the approximate theory. In this written version of my talk I concentrate on the theoretical aspects of the matching procedure of lattice QCD$+$QED and of the definition of QCD, strongly advocating a community agreement on the matching scheme to be used in future lattice QCD calculations.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.