Paper detail

Matching colored points with rectangles

Let $S$ be a point set in the plane such that each of its elements is colored either red or blue. A matching of $S$ with rectangles is any set of pairwise-disjoint axis-aligned rectangles such that each rectangle contains exactly two points of $S$. Such a matching is monochromatic if every rectangle contains points of the same color, and is bichromatic if every rectangle contains points of different colors. In this paper we study the following two problems: 1. Find a maximum monochromatic matching of $S$ with rectangles. 2. Find a maximum bichromatic matching of $S$ with rectangles. For each problem we provide a polynomial-time approximation algorithm that constructs a matching with at least $1/4$ of the number of rectangles of an optimal matching. We show that the first problem is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard even if either the matching rectangles are restricted to axis-aligned segments or $S$ is in general position, that is, no two points of $S$ share the same $x$ or $y$ coordinate. We further show that the second problem is also $\mathsf{NP}$-hard, even if $S$ is in general position. These $\mathsf{NP}$-hardness results follow by showing that deciding the existence of a perfect matching is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete in each case. The approximation results are based on a relation of our problem with the problem of finding a maximum independent set in a family of axis-aligned rectangles. With this paper we extend previous ones on matching one-colored points with rectangles and squares, and matching two-colored points with segments. Furthermore, using our techniques, we prove that it is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete to decide a perfect matching with rectangles in the case where all points have the same color, solving an open problem of Bereg, Mutsanas, and Wolff [CGTA (2009)].

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.