Matched predictions for the bbˉHb\bar{b}H cross section at the 13 TeV LHC

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

We present up-to-date matched predictions for the bbˉHb\bar{b}H inclusive cross section at the LHC at s=13\sqrt{s}=13 TeV. Using a previously developed method, our predictions consistently combine the complete NLO contributions that are present in the 4-flavor scheme calculation, including finite b-quark mass effects as well as top-loop induced YbYtY_b Y_t interference contributions, with the resummation of collinear logarithms of mb/mHm_b/m_H as present in the 5-flavor scheme calculation up to NNLO. We provide a detailed estimate of the perturbative uncertainties of the matched result by examining its dependence on the factorization and renormalization scales, the scale of the Yukawa coupling, and also the low b-quark matching scale in the PDFs. We motivate the use of a central renormalization scale of mHm_H/2, which is halfway between the values typically chosen in the 4-flavor and 5-flavor scheme calculations. We evaluate the parametric uncertainties due to the PDFs and the b-quark mass, and in particular discuss how to systematically disentangle the parametric mbm_b dependence and the unphysical b-quark matching scale dependence. Our best prediction for the bbˉHb\bar{b} H production cross section in the Standard Model at 13 TeV and for mHm_H = 125 GeV is σ(bbˉH)=0.52 pb [1±9.6%(perturbative) −3.6%+2.9%(parametric)]σ(b\bar b H) = 0.52 \,{\rm pb}\, [1 \pm 9.6\% {\rm (perturbative)}\,{}^{+2.9\%}_{-3.6\%} {\rm (parametric)}]. We also provide predictions for a range of Higgs masses mH∈[50,750]m_H\in [50, 750] GeV. Our method to compute the matched prediction and to evaluate its uncertainty can be readily applied to other heavy-quark-initiated processes at the LHC.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.