Paper detail

Massively scalable stencil algorithm

Stencil computations lie at the heart of many scientific and industrial applications. Unfortunately, stencil algorithms perform poorly on machines with cache based memory hierarchy, due to low re-use of memory accesses. This work shows that for stencil computation a novel algorithm that leverages a localized communication strategy effectively exploits the Cerebras WSE-2, which has no cache hierarchy. This study focuses on a 25-point stencil finite-difference method for the 3D wave equation, a kernel frequently used in earth modeling as numerical simulation. In essence, the algorithm trades memory accesses for data communication and takes advantage of the fast communication fabric provided by the architecture. The algorithm -- historically memory bound -- becomes compute bound. This allows the implementation to achieve near perfect weak scaling, reaching up to 503 TFLOPs on WSE-2, a figure that only full clusters can eventually yield.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.