Paper detail

Massive Neutrinos Promote the Size Growth of Early-Type Galaxies

The effect of massive neutrinos on the evolution of the early type galaxies (ETGs) in size ($R_{e}$) and stellar mass ($M_{\star}$) is explored by tracing the merging history of galaxy progenitors with the help of the robust semi-analytic prescriptions. We show that as the presence of massive neutrinos plays a role of enhancing the mean merger rate per halo, the high-$z$ progenitors of a descendant galaxy with fixed mass evolves much more rapidly in size for a $Λ$MDM ($Λ$CDM + massive neutrinos) model than for the $Λ$CDM case. The mass-normalized size evolution of the progenitor galaxies, $R_{e}[M_{\star}/(10^{11}M_{\odot})]^{-0.57}\propto (1+z)^{-β}$, is found to be quite steep with the power-law index of $β\sim 1.5$ when the neutrino mass fraction is $f_ν=0.05$, while it is $β\sim 1$ when $f_ν=0$. It is concluded that if the presence and role of massive neutrinos are properly taken into account, it may explain away the anomalous compactness of the high-$z$ ETGs compared with the local ellipticals with similar stellar masses.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.