Paper detail

Massive MIMO versus Small-Cell Systems: Spectral and Energy Efficiency Comparison

In this paper, we study the downlink performance of two important 5G network architectures, i.e. massive multiple-input multiple-output (M-MIMO) and small-cell densification. We propose a comparative modeling for the two systems, where the user and antenna/base station (BS) locations are distributed according to Poisson point processes (PPPs). We then leverage both the stochastic geometry results and large-system analytical tool to study the SIR distribution and the average Shannon and outage rates of each network. By comparing these results, we observe that for user-average spectral efficiency, small-cell densification is favorable in crowded areas with moderate to high user density and massive MIMO with low user density. However, small-cell systems outperform M-MIMO in all cases when the performance metric is the energy efficiency. The results of this paper are useful for the optimal design of practical 5G networks.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.