Paper detail

Massive Compact Halo Objects Viewed from a Cosmological Perspective: Contribution to the Baryonic Mass Density of the Universe

[Abridged] We estimate the contribution of Massive Compact Halo Objects (Machos) and their stellar progenitors to the mass density of the Universe. If the Machos that have been detected reside in the Halo of our Galaxy, then a simple extrapolation of the Galactic population (out to 50 kpc) of Machos to cosmic scales gives a cosmic density $ρ_{Macho} = (1-5) \times 10^9 h \msun \Mpc^{-3}$, which in terms of the critical density corresponds to $Ω_{Macho}=(0.0036-0.017) h^{-1}$. Such a mass density is comparable to the baryon density implied by Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. If we take the central values of the estimates, then Machos dominate the baryonic content of the Universe today, with $Ω_{Macho}/Ω_{Baryon} \sim 0.7 h$. However, the cumulative uncertainties in the density determinations only require that $Ω_{Macho}/Ω_{Baryon} \geq 1/6 h f_{gal}$, where the fraction of galaxies that contain Machos $f_{gal} > 0.17$, and $h$ is the Hubble constant in units of 100 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$. Our best estimate for $Ω_{Macho}$ is hard to reconcile with the current best estimates of the baryonic content of the intergalactic medium indicated by measurements of the Lyman-$α$ forest. We explore the addition constraints that arise if the Machos are white dwarfs as suggested by the present microlensing data. We discuss the challenges this scenario presents at both the local and cosmic scales, emphasizing in particular the constraints on the required mass budget and nucleosynthesis products (particularly carbon).

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.