Paper detail

Masses of the components of the HDE 226868/Cyg X-1 binary system

Recent determination of the distance to HDE 226868/Cyg X-1 binary system (Reid et al., 2011) and more precise determination of the effective temperature of HDE 226868 (Caballero- Nieves et al., 2009) permit a more accurate estimate of the masses of both components. Using up to date evolutionary models, I obtain a mass range of between 25 to 35 Msun for the mass of the supergiant and between 13 to 23 Msun for the mass of the black hole. Accepting more liberal estimates of uncertainties in both the distance and the effective temperature, one may extend these ranges to 21 to 35 Msun and 10 to 23 Msun for both masses, respectively. The most likely values within these ranges are, respectively, 27 Msun and 16 Msun. The obtained mass of black hole agrees with the value 15 +- 1 Msun suggested by Orosz et al. (2011). However, the value suggested by them for the mass of the supergiant of 19 +- 2 Msun should not be used as such a star violates the mass-luminosity relation for the the massive core hydrogen burning stars. This consideration was not incorporated into the iterative process of Orosz et al. To resolve this violation I consider the possibility that the hydrogen content of HDE 222268 might be lowered as a result of the mass transfer and the induced fast rotation of the mass gainer. I analyzed the evolutionary effects of such situation and found that, while important, they do not invalidate the conclusions listed above. If, as a result of the rotation induced mixing, the present hydrogen content of HDE 226868 is equal about 0.6 (as suggested by some observational data), then its present mass may be somewhat lower: about 24 Msun rather than about 27 Msun.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.