Paper detail

Masses and Scaling Relations for Nuclear Star Clusters, and their Coexistence with Central Black Holes

Galactic nuclei typically host either a Nuclear Star Cluster (NSC, prevalent in galaxies with masses $\lesssim 10^{10}M_\odot$) or a Massive Black Hole (MBH, common in galaxies with masses $\gtrsim 10^{12}M_\odot$). In the intermediate mass range, some nuclei host both a NSC and a MBH. In this paper, we explore scaling relations between NSC mass (${\cal M}_{\rm NSC}$) and host galaxy total stellar mass (${\cal M}_{\star,\rm gal}$) using a large sample of NSCs in late- and early-type galaxies, including a number of NSCs harboring a MBH. Such scaling relations reflect the underlying physical mechanisms driving the formation and (co)evolution of these central massive objects. We find $\sim\!1.5σ$ significant differences between NSCs in late- and early-type galaxies in the slopes and offsets of the relations $r_{\rm eff,NSC}$--${\cal M}_{\rm NSC}$, $r_{\rm eff, NSC}$--${\cal M}_{\star,\rm gal}$ and ${\cal M}_{\rm NSC}$--${\cal M}_{\star,\rm gal}$, in the sense that $i)$ NSCs in late-types are more compact at fixed ${\cal M}_{\rm NSC}$ and ${\cal M}_{\star,\rm gal}$; and $ii)$ the ${\cal M}_{\rm NSC}$--${\cal M}_{\star,\rm gal}$ relation is shallower for NSCs in late-types than in early-types, similar to the ${\cal M}_{\rm BH}$--${\cal M}_{\star,\rm bulge}$ relation. We discuss these results in the context of the (possibly ongoing) evolution of NSCs, depending on host galaxy type. For NSCs with a MBH, we illustrate the possible influence of a MBH on its host NSC, by considering the ratio between the radius of the MBH sphere of influence and $r_{\rm eff, NSC}$. NSCs harbouring a sufficiently massive black hole are likely to exhibit surface brightness profile deviating from a typical King profile.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.