Masses and Scaling Relations for Nuclear Star Clusters, and their Coexistence with Central Black Holes

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

Galactic nuclei typically host either a Nuclear Star Cluster (NSC, prevalent in galaxies with masses ≲1010M⊙\lesssim 10^{10}M_\odot) or a Massive Black Hole (MBH, common in galaxies with masses ≳1012M⊙\gtrsim 10^{12}M_\odot). In the intermediate mass range, some nuclei host both a NSC and a MBH. In this paper, we explore scaling relations between NSC mass (MNSC{\cal M}_{\rm NSC}) and host galaxy total stellar mass (M⋆,gal{\cal M}_{\star,\rm gal}) using a large sample of NSCs in late- and early-type galaxies, including a number of NSCs harboring a MBH. Such scaling relations reflect the underlying physical mechanisms driving the formation and (co)evolution of these central massive objects. We find ∼ ⁣1.5σ\sim\!1.5σ significant differences between NSCs in late- and early-type galaxies in the slopes and offsets of the relations reff,NSCr_{\rm eff,NSC}--MNSC{\cal M}_{\rm NSC}, reff,NSCr_{\rm eff, NSC}--M⋆,gal{\cal M}_{\star,\rm gal} and MNSC{\cal M}_{\rm NSC}--M⋆,gal{\cal M}_{\star,\rm gal}, in the sense that i)i) NSCs in late-types are more compact at fixed MNSC{\cal M}_{\rm NSC} and M⋆,gal{\cal M}_{\star,\rm gal}; and ii)ii) the MNSC{\cal M}_{\rm NSC}--M⋆,gal{\cal M}_{\star,\rm gal} relation is shallower for NSCs in late-types than in early-types, similar to the MBH{\cal M}_{\rm BH}--M⋆,bulge{\cal M}_{\star,\rm bulge} relation. We discuss these results in the context of the (possibly ongoing) evolution of NSCs, depending on host galaxy type. For NSCs with a MBH, we illustrate the possible influence of a MBH on its host NSC, by considering the ratio between the radius of the MBH sphere of influence and reff,NSCr_{\rm eff, NSC}. NSCs harbouring a sufficiently massive black hole are likely to exhibit surface brightness profile deviating from a typical King profile.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.