Paper detail

Mass Transfer in Close, Rapidly Accreting Protobinaries: An Origin for Massive Twins?

Rapidly accreting massive protostars undergo a phase of deuterium shell burning during pre-main sequence evolution that causes them to swell to tenths of an AU in radius. During this phase, those with close binary companions will overflow their Roche lobes and begin transferring mass. Since massive stars frequently have companions at distances well under 1 AU, this process may affect the early evolution of a substantial fraction of massive stars. We use a simple protostellar evolution model to determine the range in accretion rates, mass ratios, and orbital separations for which mass transfer will occur, and we compute approximately the stability and final outcome of the transfer process. We discuss how mass transfer affects the demographics of massive binaries, and show that it provides a natural explanation for the heretofore unexplained population of massive "twins", high mass binaries with mass ratios very close to unity.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.