Paper detail

Mass-to-light Ratio of Ly-alpha Emitters: Implications of Ly-alpha Surveys at Redshifts z=5.7, 6.5, 7, and 8.8

Using a simple method to interpret the luminosity function of Ly-alpha emitters, we explore properties of Ly-alpha emitters from 5.7 < z < 8.8 with various assumptions about metallicity and stellar mass spectra. We constrain a mass-to-'observed' light ratio, M_h/L_band. For narrow-band surveys, L_band is simply related to the intrinsic Ly-alpha luminosity with a survival fraction of Ly-alpha photons, alpha_esc. The mass-to-'bolometric light', M_h/L_bol, can also be deduced, once the metallicity and stellar mass spectrum are given. The inferred M_h/L_bol is more sensitive to metallicity than to the mass spectrum. We find the following constraints on a mass-to-light ratio of Ly-alpha emitters from 5.7 < z < 7: (M_h/L_bol)(alpha_{esc}epsilon^{1/gamma})^{-1}=21-38, 14-26, and 9-17 for Z=0, 1/50, and 1 Z_sun, respectively, where epsilon is the 'duty cycle' of Ly-alpha emitters, and gamma ~ 2 is a local slope of the cumulative luminosity function. Only weak lower limits are obtained for z=8.8. Therefore, Ly-alpha emitters are consistent with either starburst galaxies M_h/L_bol ~ 0.1-1 with a smaller Ly-alpha survival fraction, alpha_{esc}epsilon^{1/gamma} ~0.01-0.05, or normal populations (M_h/L_bol ~ 10) if a good fraction of Ly-alpha photons survived, alpha_{esc}epsilon^{1/gamma} ~ 0.5-1. We find no evidence for the end of reionization in the luminosity functions of Ly-alpha emitters discovered in the current Ly-alpha surveys, including recent discovery of one Ly-alpha emitter at z=7. The data are consistent with no evolution of intrinsic properties of Ly-alpha emitters or neutral fraction in the intergalactic medium up to z=7. No detection of sources at z=8.8 does not yield a significant constraint yet. We also show that the lack of detection at z=8.8 does not rule out the high-z galaxies being the origin of the excess NIRB.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.