Paper detail

Mass spectrum of the minimal SUSY B-L model

The origin of R-parity in supersymmetric models can be explained if \BL is part of the gauge group. We discuss the mass spectrum of the minimal $U(1)_Y \times U(1)_{B-L}$ model based on a GUT implementation using CMSSM-like boundary conditions. Here we focus in particular on the Higgs and neutralino sectors in this class of models. While the neutralinos can have masses as low as 100 GeV, we show that the requirement of being consistent with existing bounds on the $Z'$ implies that in general the sfermions have masses in the multi-TeV range. In the extended Higgs sector we show the existence of a second light state which, however, will be difficult to observe, while having at the same time a SM-like Higgs in a mass range of 123-126 GeV.. Moreover, we propose a set of benchmark scenarios for phenomenological studies. On the technical side we demonstrate that gauge kinetic mixing effects can be quite important, affecting in particular the Higgs and the neutralino sectors. Not only can they shift the mass of the lightest neutralino by about 10 per-cent but also they can change the nature of neutralinos and Higgs bosons in a significant way.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.