Paper detail

Mass Ratios of Merging Double Neutron Stars as Implied by the Milky Way Population

Of the seven known double neutron stars (DNS) with precisely measure masses in the Milky Way that will merge within a Hubble time, all but one has a mass ratio, $q$, close to unity. Recently, precise measurements of three post-Keplerian parameters in the DNS J1913$+$1102 constrain this system to have a significantly non-unity mass ratio of 0.78$\pm$0.03. One may be tempted to conclude that approximately one out of seven (14\%) DNS mergers detected by gravitational wave observatories will have mass ratios significantly different from unity. However J1913$+$1102 has a relatively long merger time of 470 Myr. We show that when merger times and observational biases are taken into account, the population of Galactic DNSs imply that $\simeq98\%$ of all merging DNSs will have $q>$0.9. We then apply two separate fitting formulas informed by 3D hydrodynamic simulations of DNS mergers to our results on Galactic DNS masses, finding that either $\simeq$0.004 ${M_{\odot}}$ or $\simeq$0.010 ${M_{\odot}}$ of material will be ejected at merger, depending on which formula is used. These ejecta masses have implications for both the peak bolometric luminosities of electromagnetic counterparts (which we find to be $\sim$10$^{41}$ erg s$^{-1}$) as well as the $r$-process enrichment of the Milky Way.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.