Paper detail

Mass quantization and minimax solutions for Neri's mean field equation in 2D-turbulence

We study the mean field equation derived by Neri in the context of the statistical mechanics description of 2D-turbulence, under a "stochastic" assumption on the vortex circulations. The corresponding mathematical problem is a nonlocal semilinear elliptic equation with exponential type nonlinearity, containing a probability measure $\mathcal P\in\mathcal M([-1,1])$ which describes the distribution of the vortex circulations. Unlike the more investigated "deterministic" version, we prove that Neri's equation may be viewed as a perturbation of the widely analyzed standard mean field equation, obtained by taking $\mathcal P=δ_1$. In particular, in the physically relevant case where $\mathcal P$ is non-negatively supported and $\mathcal P(\{1\})>0$, we prove the mass quantization for blow-up sequences. We apply this result to construct minimax type solutions on bounded domains in $\mathbb R^2$ and on compact 2-manifolds without boundary.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.