Paper detail

Mass of \emph{Y}(4140) in Bethe-Salpeter equation for quarks

Using the general form of the Bethe-Salpeter wave functions for the bound states consisting of two vector fields given in our previous work, we investigate the molecular state composed of $D^{*+}_s$$D^{*-}_s$. However, for the SU(3) symmetry the component $D^{*+}_s$$D^{*-}_s$ is coupled with the other components $D^{*0}$$\bar{D}^{*0}$ and $D^{*+}$$D^{*-}$. Then we interpret the internal structure of the observed \emph{Y}(4140) state as a mixed state of pure molecule states $D^{*0}$$\bar{D}^{*0}$, $D^{*+}$$D^{*-}$ and $D^{*+}_s$$D^{*-}_s$ with quantum numbers $J^P=0^+$. In this paper, the operator product expansion is used to introduce the nonperturbative contribution from the vacuum condensates into the interaction between two heavy mesons. The calculated mass of \emph{Y}(4140) is consistent with the experimental value, and we conclude that it is a more reasonable scenario to explain the structure of Y (4140) as a mixture of pure molecule states.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.