Paper detail

Mass Models of Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies with Variable Stellar Anisotropy. I. Jeans Analysis

Using a flexible galactic model with variable stellar velocity anisotropy, I apply the classical Jeans mass modeling approach to the five dwarf spheroidal galaxies with the largest homogeneous datasets of stellar line-of-sight velocities (between 330 and 2500 stars per galaxy) -- Carina, Fornax, Leo~I, Sculptor, and Sextans. I carry out an exhaustive model parameter search, assigning absolute probabilities to each parameter combination. My main finding is that there is a well defined radius (unique for each galaxy) where the Jeans analysis constraints on the enclosed mass are tightest, and are much better than the constraints at previously suggested radii (e.g. 300~pc). For Carina, Fornax, Leo~I, Sculptor, and Sextans the enclosed DM mass is $0.94 \pm 0.20$ (at 410~pc), $7.1 \pm 0.9$ (at 925~pc), $1.75 \pm 0.20$ (at 390~pc), $2.59 \pm 0.42$ (at 435~pc), and $2.3 \pm 0.9$ (at 1035~pc), respectively (two-sigma uncertainties; in $10^7$~M$_\odot$ units). Local DM density has the tightest constraints at smaller (and also unique for each galaxy) radii. The largest central DM density constraint is for Sculptor: $ρ_0\gtrsim 0.09$~$M_\odot$~pc$^{-3}$ (at two-sigma level). I show that the DM density logarithmic slope is totally unconstrained by the Jeans analysis at all the radii probed by the data (and not just at the center, as was demonstrated before). Stellar velocity anisotropy has only very weak constraints. In particular, pure central tangential anisotropy is ruled out at better than two sigma level for three dwarfs, and the data are consistent with the global stellar velocity isotropy for all the five galaxies.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.