Paper detail

Mass loss on the red giant branch: plasmoid-driven winds above the RGB bump

The onset of cool massive winds in evolved giants is correlated with an evolutionary feature on the red giant branch known as the bump. Also at the bump, shear instability in the star leads to magnetic fields that occur preferentially on small length scales. Pneuman (1983) has suggested that the emergence of small scale flux tubes in the Sun can give rise to enhanced acceleration of the solar wind as a result of plasmoid acceleration (the melon seed mechanism). In this paper, we examine the Pneuman formalism to determine if it may shed some light on the process that drives mass loss from stars above the bump. Because we do not currently have detailed information for some of the relevant physical parameters, we are not yet able to derive a detailed model. Instead, our goal in this paper is to explore a proof of concept. Using parameters that are known to be plausible in cool giants, we find that the total mass loss rate from such stars can be replicated. Moreover, we find that the radial profile of the wind speed in such stars can be steep or shallow depending on the fraction of the mass loss which is contained in the plasmoids. This is consistent with empirical data which indicate that the velocity profiles of winds from cool giants range from shallow to steep.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.