Paper detail

Mass-loss and expansion of ultra compact dwarf galaxies through gas expulsion and stellar evolution for top-heavy stellar initial mass functions

(abridged) The dynamical V-band mass-to-light ratios of ultra compact dwarf galaxies (UCDs) are higher than predicted by simple stellar population models with the canonical stellar initial mass function (IMF). One way to explain this finding is a top-heavy IMF, so that the unseen mass is provided by additional remnants of high-mass stars. A possible explanation for why the IMF in UCDs could be top-heavy while this is not the case in less massive stellar systems is that encounters between proto-stars and stars become probable in forming massive systems. However, the required number of additional stellar remnants proves to be rather high, which raises the question of how their progenitors would affect the early evolution of a UCD. We have therefore calculated the first 200 Myr of the evolution of the UCDs, using the particle-mesh code Superbox. It is assumed that the stellar populations of UCDs were created in an initial starburst, which implies heavy mass loss during the following approximately 40 Myr due to primordial gas expulsion and supernova explosions. We find at the end of the simulations for various initial conditions and (tabulated) mass-loss histories objects that roughly resemble UCDs. Thus, the existence of UCDs does not contradict the notion that their stellar populations formed rapidly and with a top-heavy IMF. We find tentative evidence that the UCDs may have had densities as high as 10^8 M_sun/pc^3 at birth.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.