Paper detail

Mass function and bias of dark matter halos for non-Gaussian initial conditions

We revisit the derivation of the mass function and the bias of dark matter halos for non-Gaussian initial conditions. We use a steepest-descent approach to point out that exact results can be obtained for the high-mass tail of the halo mass function and the two-point correlation of massive halos. Focusing on primordial non-Gaussianity of the local type, we check that these results agree with numerical simulations. The high-mass cutoff of the halo mass function takes the same form as the one obtained from the Press-Schechter formalism, but with a linear threshold $δ_L$ that depends on the definition of the halo. We show that a simple formula, which obeys this high-mass asymptotic and uses the fit obtained for Gaussian initial conditions, matches numerical simulations while keeping the mass function normalized to unity. Next, by deriving the real-space halo two-point correlation in the spirit of Kaiser (1984) and taking a Fourier transform, we obtain good agreement with simulations for the correction to the halo bias due to primordial non-Gaussianity. Therefore, neither the halo mass function nor the bias require an ad-hoc parameter $q$ provided one uses the correct linear threshold $δ_L$ and pays attention to halo displacements. The nonlinear real-space expression can be useful for checking that the "linearized" bias is a valid approximation. Moreover, it clearly shows how the baryon acoustic oscillation at $\sim 100 h^{-1}$Mpc is amplified by the bias of massive halos and modified by primordial non-Gaussianity. On smaller scales, the correction to the real-space bias roughly scales as $\fNL \, b_M(\fNL=0) \, x^2$. The low-$k$ behavior of the halo bias does not imply a divergent real-space correlation, so that one does not need to introduce counterterms that depend on the survey size.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.