Paper detail

Mass function and assembly of dark halos: an approach to inventory isolated overdense regions in random fields

In order to attain a statistical description of the evolution of cosmic density fluctuations in agreement with results from the numerical simulations, we introduce a probability conditional formalism (CF) based on an inventory of isolated overdense regions in a density random field. This formalism is a useful tool for describing at the same time the mass function (MF) of dark haloes, their mass aggregation histories (MAHs) and merging rates (MRs). The CF focuses on virialized regions in a self-consistent way rather than in mass elements, and it offers an economical description for a variety of random fields. Within the framework of the CF, we confirm that, for a Gaussian field, it is not possible to reproduce at the same time the MF, MAH, and MR of haloes, both for a constant and moving barrier. Then, we develop an inductive method for constraining the cumulative conditional probability from a given halo MF description, and thus, using the CF, we calculate the halo MAHs and MRs. By applying this method to the MF measured in numerical simulations by Tinker et al. 2008, we find that a reasonable solution, justified by a mass conservation argument, is obtained if ones introduce a rescaling -increment by ~30% - of the virial mass used in simulations and a (slight) deviation from Gaussianity. Thus, both the MAH and MR obtained by a Monte Carlo merger tree agree now with the predictions of numerical simulations. We discuss on the necessity of rescaling the virial mass in simulations when comparing with analytical approaches on the ground of the matter not accounted as part of the halos and the halo mass limit due to numerical. Our analysis supports the presence of a diffuse dark matter component that is not taken into account in the measured halo MFs inasmuch as it is not part of the collapsed structures.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.