Paper detail

Mass concentration and aging in the parabolic Anderson model with doubly-exponential tails

We study the solutions $u=u(x,t)$ to the Cauchy problem on $\mathbb Z^d\times(0,\infty)$ for the parabolic equation $\partial_t u=Δu+ξu$ with initial data $u(x,0)=1_{\{0\}}(x)$. Here $Δ$ is the discrete Laplacian on $\mathbb Z^d$ and $ξ=(ξ(z))_{z\in\mathbb Z^d}$ is an i.i.d.\ random field with doubly-exponential upper tails. We prove that, for large $t$ and with large probability, a majority of the total mass $U(t):=\sum_x u(x,t)$ of the solution resides in a bounded neighborhood of a site $Z_t$ that achieves an optimal compromise between the local Dirichlet eigenvalue of the Anderson Hamiltonian $Δ+ξ$ and the distance to the origin. The processes $t\mapsto Z_t$ and $t \mapsto \tfrac1t \log U(t)$ are shown to converge in distribution under suitable scaling of space and time. Aging results for $Z_t$, as well as for the solution to the parabolic problem, are also established. The proof uses the characterization of eigenvalue order statistics for $Δ+ξ$ in large sets recently proved by the first two authors.

preprint2017arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.