Paper detail

Mass Calibration of the CODEX Cluster Sample using SPIDERS Spectroscopy -- II. The X-ray Luminosity-Mass Relation

We perform the calibration of the X-ray luminosity--mass scaling relation on a sample of 344 CODEX clusters with $z<0.66$ using the dynamics of their member galaxies. Spectroscopic follow-up measurements have been obtained from the SPIDERS survey, leading to a sample of 6,658 red member galaxies. We use the Jeans equation to calculate halo masses, assuming an NFW mass profile and analyzing a broad range of anisotropy profiles. With a scaling relation of the form $L_{\rm{X}} \propto \text{A}_{\rm{X}}M_{\text{200c}}^{\text{B}_{\rm{X}}} E(z)^2 (1+z)^{γ_{\rm{X}}}$, we find best fit parameters $ \text{A}_{\rm{X}}=5.7^{+0.4}_{-0.5} (\pm0.6)\times10^{43}\,\mathrm{erg\,s^{-1}}$, $\text{B}_{\rm{X}}=2.5\pm0.2(\pm0.07)$, $γ_{\rm{X}}=-2.6^{+1.1}_{-1.2}(\pm0.74)$, where we include systematic uncertainties in parentheses and for a pivot mass and redshift of $3\times10^{14}M_\odot$ and 0.16, respectively. We compare our constraints with previous results, and we combine our sample with the SPT SZE--selected cluster subsample observed with \XMM\, extending the validity of our results to a wider range of redshifts and cluster masses.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.