Paper detail

Mass Calibration and Cosmological Analysis of the SPT-SZ Galaxy Cluster Sample Using Velocity Dispersion $σ_v$ and X-ray $Y_\textrm{X}$ Measurements

We present a velocity dispersion-based mass calibration of the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect survey (SPT-SZ) galaxy cluster sample. Using a homogeneously selected sample of 100 cluster candidates from 720 deg2 of the survey along with 63 velocity dispersion ($σ_v$) and 16 X-ray Yx measurements of sample clusters, we simultaneously calibrate the mass-observable relation and constrain cosmological parameters. The calibrations using $σ_v$ and Yx are consistent at the $0.6σ$ level, with the $σ_v$ calibration preferring ~16% higher masses. We use the full cluster dataset to measure $σ_8(Ω_ m/0.27)^{0.3}=0.809\pm0.036$. The SPT cluster abundance is lower than preferred by either the WMAP9 or Planck+WMAP9 polarization (WP) data, but assuming the sum of the neutrino masses is $\sum m_ν=0.06$ eV, we find the datasets to be consistent at the 1.0$σ$ level for WMAP9 and 1.5$σ$ for Planck+WP. Allowing for larger $\sum m_ν$ further reconciles the results. When we combine the cluster and Planck+WP datasets with BAO and SNIa, the preferred cluster masses are $1.9σ$ higher than the Yx calibration and $0.8σ$ higher than the $σ_v$ calibration. Given the scale of these shifts (~44% and ~23% in mass, respectively), we execute a goodness of fit test; it reveals no tension, indicating that the best-fit model provides an adequate description of the data. Using the multi-probe dataset, we measure $Ω_ m=0.299\pm0.009$ and $σ_8=0.829\pm0.011$. Within a $ν$CDM model we find $\sum m_ν= 0.148\pm0.081$ eV. We present a consistency test of the cosmic growth rate. Allowing both the growth index $γ$ and the dark energy equation of state parameter $w$ to vary, we find $γ=0.73\pm0.28$ and $w=-1.007\pm0.065$, demonstrating that the expansion and the growth histories are consistent with a LCDM model ($γ=0.55; \,w=-1$).

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access71 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.