Paper detail

Mass accretion toward black holes in the final phase of galaxy mergers

We studied the final phases of galactic mergers, focusing on interactions between supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and the interstellar medium in a central sub-kpc region, using an N-body/hydrodynamics code. This numerical experiment aims to understand the fate of the gas supplied by mergers of two or more galaxies with SMBHs, whose masses are $10^7 M_\odot$. We observed that the mass accretion rate to one SMBH exceeds the Eddington accretion rate when the distance between two black holes (BHs) rapidly decreases. However, this rapid accretion phase does not last for more than $10^7$ yrs, and it drops to $\sim$ 10% of the Eddington rate in the quasi-steady accretion phase. The rapid accretion is caused by the angular momentum transfer from the gas to the stellar component, and the moderate accretion in the quasi-steady phase is caused {by turbulent viscosity and gravitational torque in the disk. The second merger event enhances the mass accretion to the BHs; however, this phase takes place on a similar timescale to the first merger event. We also found that the AGN feedback and the mass accretion to BHs can coexist in the central region of merged galaxies, if the amount of feedback energy is given as $(2 \times 10^{-4} - 2 \times 10^{-3} )\dot{M} c^2$, where $\dot{M}$ is the accretion rate to $r= 1$ pc. The accretion rate is suppressed by $\sim$ 1/50 in the quasi-steady accretion phase for $0.02 \dot{M} c^2$. The fraction of the gas that finally falls to each BH is approximately 5-7% of the supplied total gas mass ($10^8 M_\odot$), and 15-20% of the gas forms a circumnuclear gas inside 100 pc. This remnant gas heavily obscures the luminous phase of the active galactic nuclei (AGN) during merger events, and the moderate AGN feedback does not alter this property.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.