Paper detail

Mass accretion rates of the HectoMAP clusters of galaxies

We estimate the mass accretion rate (MAR) of the 346 clusters of galaxies in the HectoMAP Cluster Survey. The clusters span the redshift range $0.17-0.42$ and the $M_{200}$ mass range $\approx (0.5 - 3.5)\cdot 10^{14} M_\odot$. The MAR estimate is based on the caustic technique along with a spherical infall model. Our analysis extends the measurement of MARs for 129 clusters at $z<0.3$ from the Cluster Infall Regions in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (CIRS) and the Hectospec Cluster Survey (HeCS) to redshift $z \sim 0.42$. Averaging over redshift, low-mass clusters with $M_{200}\sim 0.7\cdot 10^{14} M_\odot$ accrete $\sim 3\cdot 10^4 M_\odot$yr$^{-1}$; more massive clusters with $M_{200}\sim 2.8\cdot 10^{14} M_\odot$ accrete $\sim 1\cdot 10^5 M_\odot$yr$^{-1}$. Low- and high-mass clusters increase their MAR by $\sim 46\%$ and $\sim 84\%$, respectively, as the redshift increases from $z\sim 0.17-0.29$ to $z\sim 0.34-0.42$. The MARs at fixed redshift increase with mass and MARs at fixed mass increase with redshift in agreement with $Λ$CDM cosmological model for hierarchical structure formation. We consider the extension of MAR measurements to $z \sim 1$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.