Paper detail

Mass accretion rates and multi-scale halo environment in cold and warm dark matter cosmologies

We study the evolving environment dependence of mass accretion by dark haloes in simulations of cold and warm dark matter (CDM and WDM) cosmologies. The latter allows us to probe the nature of halo growth at scales below the WDM half-mode mass, which form an extreme regime of nonlinear collisionless dynamics and offer an excellent test-bed for ideas relating to hierarchical growth. As environmental proxies, we use the local halo-centric matter density $δ$ and tidal anisotropy $α$, as well as large-scale halo bias $b_1$. Our analysis, while reproducing known trends for environment-dependent accretion in CDM, as well as the comparison between accretion in CDM and WDM, reveals several interesting new features. As expected from excursion set models, WDM haloes have higher specific accretion rates, dominated by the accretion of diffuse mass, as compared to CDM haloes. For low-mass WDM haloes, we find that the environment-dependence of both diffuse mass accretion as well as accretion by mergers is almost fully explained by $α$. For the other cases, $δ$ plays at least a comparable role. We detect, for the first time, a significant and evolving assembly bias due to diffuse mass accretion for low-mass CDM and WDM haloes (after excluding splashback objects), with a $z=0$ strength higher than with almost all known secondary variables and largely explained by $α$. Our results place constraints on semi-analytical merger tree algorithms, which in turn could affect the predictions of galaxy evolution models based on them.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.