Paper detail

Marx after Okishio: Falling Rate of Profit with Constant Rate of Exploitation

Can cost-reducing technical change lead to a fall in the long run rate of profit if class struggle manages to keep the rate of exploitation constant? In a general circulating capital model, we derive sufficient conditions for cost-reducing technical change to both keep the rate of exploitation constant and lead to a fall in the equilibrium rate of profit. Further, if the real wage bundle is such that the maximum price-value ratio is larger than 1 plus the rate of exploitation, then starting from any configuration of technology and real wage, we can always find a viable, CU-LS technical change that satisfies the sufficient conditions for the previous result. Taken together, these results vindicate Marx's claim in Volume III of Capital, that if the rate of exploitation remains unchanged then viable, CU-LS technical change in capitalist economies can lead to a fall in the long run rate of profit.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.