Paper detail

Marrying ab initio calculations and Halo EFT: the case of ${}^7{\rm Be} + p \rightarrow {}^8{\rm B} + γ$

We report a leading-order (LO) calculation of $^7\mathrm{Be}(p,γ)^8\mathrm{B}$ in a low-energy effective field theory. $^8\mathrm{B}$ is treated as a shallow proton$+^7\mathrm{Be}$ core and proton$+^7\mathrm{Be}^{*}$ (core excitation) $p$-wave bound state. The couplings are fixed using measured binding energies and proton-$^7\mathrm{Be}$ $s$-wave scattering lengths, together with $^8\mathrm{B}$ asymptotic normalization coefficients from ab initio calculations. We obtain a zero-energy $S$-factor of $18.2 \pm 1.2~({\rm ANC~only})$ eV b. Given that this is a LO result it is consistent with the recommended value $S(0)=20.8\pm1.6$ eV b. Our computed $S(E)$ compares favorably with experimental data on $^7\mathrm{Be}(p,γ)^8\mathrm{B}$ for $E <0.4$ MeV. We emphasize the important role of proton-$^7\mathrm{Be}$ scattering parameters in determining the energy dependence of $S(E)$, and demonstrate that their present uncertainties significantly limit attempts to extrapolate these data to stellar energies.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.