Paper detail

Markov Random Fields, Markov Cocycles and The 3-colored Chessboard

The well-known Hammersley-Clifford theorem states (under certain conditions) that any Markov random field is a Gibbs state for a nearest neighbor interaction. In this paper we study Markov random fields for which the proof of the Hammersley-Clifford theorem does not apply. Following Petersen and Schmidt we utilize the formalism of cocycles for the homoclinic equivalence relation and introduce "Markov cocycles", reparametrisations of Markov specifications. The main part of this paper exploits this to deduce the conclusion of the Hammersley-Clifford theorem for a family of Markov fields which are outside the theorem's purview where the underlying graph is $\mathbb{Z}^d$. This family includes all Markov random fields whose support is the d-dimensional "3-colored chessboard". On the other extreme, we construct a family of shift-invariant Markov random fields which are not given by any finite range shift-invariant interaction.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.