Paper detail

Markov Gap and Bound Entanglement in Haar Random State

Bound entanglement refers to entangled states that cannot be distilled into maximally entangled states and therefore cannot directly be used in many quantum information processing protocols. We identify a relationship between bound entanglement and the Markov gap, which is introduced within holography via the entanglement wedge cross section and is related to the fidelity of the partial Markov recovery problem. We prove that a bound entangled state must have a nonzero Markov gap. Conversely, for sufficiently large systems, a state with a weakly nonzero Markov gap typically has a bound entangled or separable marginal state, where entanglement is undistillable. Furthermore, this implies that the transition from a bound entangled to a separable state originates from the properties of states with a weakly nonzero Markov gap, which may be dual to non-perturbative effects from a holographic perspective. Our results shed light on the investigation of the Markov gap and enhance interdisciplinary applications of quantum information.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.