Paper detail

Mapping the hydrodynamic response to the initial geometry in heavy-ion collisions

We investigate how the initial geometry of a heavy-ion collision is transformed into final flow observables by solving event-by-event ideal hydrodynamics with realistic fluctuating initial conditions. We study quantitatively to what extent anisotropic flow (v_n) is determined by the initial eccentricity epsilon_n for a set of realistic simulations, and we discuss which definition of epsilon_n gives the best estimator of v_n. We find that the common practice of using an r^2 weight in the definition of varepsilon_n in general results in a poorer predictor of v_n than when using r^n weight, for n > 2. We similarly study the importance of additional properties of the initial state. For example, we show that in order to correctly predict v_4 and v_5 for non-central collisions, one must take into account nonlinear terms proportional to (epsilon_2)^2 and (epsilon_2)*(epsilon_3), respectively. We find that it makes no difference whether one calculates the eccentricities over a range of rapidity, or in a single slice at z=0, nor is it important whether one uses an energy or entropy density weight. This knowledge will be important for making a more direct link between experimental observables and hydrodynamic initial conditions, the latter being poorly constrained at present.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.