Paper detail

Mapping the differential reddening in globular clusters

We build differential-reddening maps for 66 Galactic globular clusters (GCs) with archival HST WFC/ACS F606W and F814W photometry. Because of the different GC sizes (characterised by the half-light radius $R_h$) and distances to the Sun, the WFC/ACS field of view ($200\arcsec\times200\arcsec$) coverage ($R_{obs}$) lies in the range $1\la R_{obs}/R_h\la15$ for about 85% of the sample, with about 10% covering only the inner ($R_{obs}\la R_h$) parts. We divide the WFC/ACS field of view across each cluster in a regular cell grid, and extract the stellar-density Hess diagram from each cell, shifting it in colour and magnitude along the reddening vector until matching the mean diagram. Thus, the maps correspond to the internal dispersion of the reddening around the mean. Depending on the number of available stars (i.e. probable members with adequate photometric errors), the angular resolution of the maps range from $\approx7\arcsec\times7\arcsec$ to $\approx20\arcsec\times20\arcsec$. We detect spatially-variable extinction in the 66 globular clusters studied, with mean values ranging from $\mEBV\approx0.018$ (NGC\,6981) up to $\mEBV\approx0.16$ (Palomar\,2). Differential-reddening correction decreases the observed foreground reddening and the apparent distance modulus but, since they are related to the same value of \EBV, the distance to the Sun is conserved. Fits to the mean-ridge lines of the highly-extincted and photometrically scattered globular cluster Palomar\,2 show that age and metallicity also remain unchanged after the differential-reddening correction, but measurement uncertainties decrease because of the reduced scatter. The lack of systematic variations of \mEBV\ with both the foreground reddening and the sampled cluster area indicates that the main source of differential reddening is interstellar.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.