Paper detail

Mapping the core mass function onto the stellar IMF: multiplicity matters

Observations indicate that the central portions of the Present-Day Prestellar Core Mass Function (CMF) and the Stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF) both have approximately log-normal shapes, but that the CMF is displaced to higher mass than the IMF by a factor F = 4+/-1. This has lead to suggestions that the shape of the IMF is directly inherited from the shape of the CMF - and therefore, by implication, that there is a self-similar mapping from the CMF onto the IMF. If we assume a self-similar mapping, it follows (i) that F = N0/eta, where eta is the mean fraction of a core's mass that ends up in stars, and N0 is the mean number of stars spawned by a single core; and (ii) that the stars spawned by a single core must have an approximately log-normal distribution of relative masses, with universal standard deviation sigma0. Observations can be expected to deliver ever more accurate estimates of F, but this still leaves a degeneracy between eta and N0; and sigma0 is also unconstrained by observation. Here we show that these parameters can be estimated by invoking binary statistics. Specifically, if (a) each core spawns one long-lived binary system, and (b) the probability that a star of mass M is part of this long-lived binary is proportional to M^alpha, current observations of the binary frequency as a function of primary mass and the distribution of mass ratios strongly favour eta = 1.0 +/- 0.3, N0 = 4.3 +/- 0.4, sigma0 = 0.3 +/- 0.03 and alpha = 0.9 +/- 0.6. The mapping from CMF to IMF is not necessarily self-similar - there are many possible motivations for a non self-similar mapping - but if it is not, then the shape of the IMF cannot be inherited from the CMF. Given the limited observational constraints currently available and the ability of a self-similar mapping to satisfy them, the possibility that the shape of the IMF is inherited from the CMF cannot be ruled out at this juncture.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.