Paper detail

Mapping Gaia parallax systematic errors over the sky with faint Milky Way stars

Parallaxes measured by the Gaia mission have huge significance for astronomy, but parallaxes in Gaia DR2 are known to have systematic errors that depend on the source position and other quantities. We use the abundant information in faint Milky Way stars, along with the GOG simulation of the Gaia catalog, to probe the spatial dependence of Gaia DR2 parallax systematic errors in an empirical way. The parallax signal, concentrated in thick disk turnoff stars with magnitude G ~ 17, is sufficient to construct maps of the parallax systematic error over the majority of the sky. These maps show a locally regular "waffle pattern" on ~1 degree scales following Gaia scan directions, stronger linear "scar" features, and coherent variations on larger scales. The parallax bias maps also retain traces of astrophysical effects such as dust clouds. The waffle pattern, known from earlier maps of the Magellanic Clouds, extends over the entire sky; its local rms amplitude averages 15 microarcsec and varies by about a factor of two. The strength of this pattern increases by a factor ~6 from magnitude G = 13 to G = 20. Correlations with parallaxes of quasars and of stars with independent distance estimates support our bias estimates. Using similar methods, we map systematic errors in the proper motion and examine the relationship with the parallax systematics. We provide a code package to access and query our bias maps. Similar tests on the general stellar population should be useful in quantifying systematic errors in future Gaia releases.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.