Paper detail

Manifestly scale-invariant regularization and quantum effective operators

Scale invariant theories are often used to address the hierarchy problem, however the regularization of their quantum corrections introduces a dimensionful coupling (dimensional regularization) or scale (Pauli-Villars, etc) which break this symmetry explicitly. We show how to avoid this problem and study the implications of a manifestly scale invariant regularization in (classical) scale invariant theories. We use a dilaton-dependent subtraction function $μ(σ)$ which after spontaneous breaking of scale symmetry generates the usual DR subtraction scale $μ(\langleσ\rangle)$. One consequence is that "evanescent" interactions generated by scale invariance of the action in $d=4-2ε$ (but vanishing in $d=4$), give rise to new, finite quantum corrections. We find a (finite) correction $ΔU(ϕ,σ)$ to the one-loop scalar potential for $ϕ$ and $σ$, beyond the Coleman-Weinberg term. $ΔU$ is due to an evanescent correction ($\proptoε$) to the field-dependent masses (of the states in the loop) which multiplies the pole ($\propto 1/ε$) of the momentum integral, to give a finite quantum result. $ΔU$ contains a non-polynomial operator $\sim ϕ^6/σ^2$ of known coefficient and is independent of the subtraction dimensionless parameter. A more general $μ(ϕ,σ)$ is ruled out since, in their classical decoupling limit, the visible sector (of the higgs $ϕ$) and hidden sector (dilaton $σ$) still interact at the quantum level, thus the subtraction function must depend on the dilaton only. The method is useful in models where preserving scale symmetry at quantum level is important.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.