Paper detail

Manifestation of Rank-Tuned Weak Measurements Towards Featured State Generation

We propose that an unsharp measurement-based process to generate genuine multipartite entanglement from an entangled initial state with a fewer number of qubits can be classified in two ways -- biased and unbiased inflation protocols. In the biased case, genuine multipartite entanglement (GME) of the resulting state obtained after a single measurement outcome is optimized, thereby creating a possibility of states with high GME while in the unbiased case, average GME is optimized over all possible outcomes. Interestingly, we show that the set of two-qubit unsharp measurements can generate multipartite states having different features according to GME measure, generalized geometric measure, the monogamy-based entanglement measure, tangle and robustness against particle loss quantified via persistency depending on the rank of the unsharp measurement operators. Specifically, in the process of producing three-qubit pure states, we prove that rank-$2$ measurements can create only Greenberger Horne Zeilinger (GHZ)-class states while only W-class states are produced with rank-$4$ measurements although rank-$3$ measurements are capable to generate both. In the case of multipartite states with an arbitrary number of qubits, we report that the average content of genuine multipartite entanglement increases with the decrease of the rank in the measurement operators although the persistency decreases with the rank, both in the biased as well as unbiased protocols.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.