Paper detail

Making the most of data: Quantum Monte Carlo Post-Analysis Revisited

In quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods, energy estimators are calculated as the statistical average of the Markov chain sampling of energy estimator along with an associated statistical error. This error estimation is not straightforward and there are several choices of the error estimation methods. We evaluate the performance of three methods, Straatsma, an autoregressive model, and a blocking analysis based on von Neumann's ratio test for randomness, for the energy time-series given by Diffusion Monte Carlo, Full Configuration Interaction Quantum Monte Carlo and Coupled Cluster Monte Carlo methods. From these analyses we describe a hybrid analysis method which provides reliable error estimates for series of all lengths. Equally important is the estimation of the appropriate start point of the equilibrated phase, and two heuristic schemes are tested, establishing that MSER (mean squared error rule) gives reasonable and constant estimations independent of the length of time-series.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.