Paper detail

Majority bootstrap percolation on the random graph G(n,p)

Majority bootstrap percolation on the random graph $G_{n,p}$ is a process of spread of "activation" on a given realisation of the graph with a given number of initially active nodes. At each step those vertices which have more active neighbours than inactive neighbours become active as well. We study the size $A^*$ of the final active set. The parameters of the model are, besides $n$ (tending to $\infty$), the size $A(0)=A_0(n)$ of the initially active set and the probability $p=p(n)$ of the edges in the graph. We prove that the process cannot percolate for $A(0) = o(n)$. We study the process for $A(0) = θn$ and every range of $p$ and show that the model exhibits different behaviours for different ranges of $p$. For very small $p \ll \frac{1}{n}$, the activation does not spread significantly. For large $p \gg \frac{1}{n}$ then we see a phase transition at $A(0) \simeq \frac{1}{2}n$. In the case $p= \frac{c}{n}$, the activation propagates to a significantly larger part of the graph but (the process does not percolate) a positive part of the graph remains inactive.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.