Paper detail

Magnitude and significance of the peak of early embryonic mortality

Biologically, for any organism life does not start at birth but at fertilization of the embryo. Embryonic development is of great importance because it determines congenital anomalies and influences their severity. Whereas there is detailed qualitative knowledge of the successive steps of embryonic development, little is known about their probabilities of success or failure. Embryonic mortality as a function of post fertilization time provides a simple (albeit crude) way to identify major defects. We find that, in line with the few other species for which data are available, the embryonic mortality of zebrafish has a prominent peak shortly after fertilization. This is called the early embryonic mortality (EEM) effect. Although a number of immediate causes of death (e.g. infection, excess of carbon dioxide or of lactic acid, chromosomal defects) can be cited, the common underlying factor remains unknown. After reviewing embryonic mortality data available for chicken and a few other farm animals, we explain that zebrafish are particularly suited for such a study because embryogenesis can be followed from its very beginning and can be observed easily thanks to transparent egg shells. We report the following findings. (i) The mortality peak occurs in the first 15% of the 75-80 hours of embryogenesis and it is about 50 times higher than the low plateau which follows. (ii) The shape of the age-specific death rate is largely independent of the death level. Presently, little is known about the nature of embryonic defects. However, by reviewing two special cases we show that even small initial defects, e.g. spatial cellular asymmetries or irregularities in the timing of development, carry with them lethal effects in later stages of embryogenesis.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.