Paper detail

Magnetorotational core collapse of possible GRB progenitors. IV. A wider range of progenitors

The final collapse of the cores of massive stars can lead to a wide variety of outcomes in terms of electromagnetic and kinetic energies, nucleosynthesis, and remnants. The connection of this wide spectrum of explosion and remnant types to the properties of the progenitors remains an open issue. Rotation and magnetic fields in Wolf-Rayet stars of subsolar metallicity may explain extreme events such as superluminous supernovae and gamma-ray bursts powered by proto-magnetars or collapsars. Continuing numerical studies of magnetorotational core collapse including detailed neutrino physics, we focus on progenitors with zero-age main-sequence masses in the range between 5 and 39 solar masses. The pre-collapse stars are one dimensional models employing prescriptions for the effects of rotation and magnetic fields. Eight of the ten stars we consider being the results of chemically homogeneous evolution due to enhanced rotational mixing (Aguilera-Dena et al. 2018). All but one of them produce explosions driven by neutrino heating (more likely for low mass progenitors up to 8 solar masses) and non-spherical flows or by magnetorotational stresses (more frequent above 26 solar masses). In most of them and for the one non-exploding model, ongoing accretion leads to black-hole formation. Rapid rotation makes a subsequent collapsar activity plausible. Models not forming black holes show proto-magnetar driven jets. Conditions for the formation of nickel are more favourable in magneto-rotationally driven models, though our rough estimates fall short of the requirements for extremely bright events if these are powered by radioactive decay. However, approximate light curves of our models suggest that a proto-magnetar or black hole spin-down may fuel luminous transients (with peak luminosities ~ 10^{43...44} erg).

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.