Paper detail

Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Binary Neutron Star Mergers in General Relativity: Effects of Magnetic Field Orientation on Jet Launching

Binary neutron star (NSNS) mergers can be sources of gravitational waves coincident with electromagnetic counterpart emission. To solidify their role as multimessenger sources, we present fully 3D, general relativistic, magnetohydrodynamic simulations of spinning NSNSs initially on quasicircular orbits that merge and undergo delayed collapse to a black hole (BH). The NSNSs consist of two identical stars modeled as $Γ=2$ polytropes with spin $χ_{NS}= 0.36$ aligned along the direction of the total orbital angular momentum $L$. Each star is initially threaded by a dynamical unimportant interior dipole B-field. The field is extended into the exterior where a nearly force-free magnetosphere resembles that of a pulsar. The magnetic dipole moment $μ$ is either aligned or perpendicular to $L$ and has the same initial magnitude for each orientation. For comparison, we also impose symmetry across the orbital plane in one case where $μ$ in both stars is aligned along $L$. We find that the lifetime of the transient hypermassive neutron star remnant, the jet launching time, and the ejecta are very sensitive to the B-field orientation. By contrast, the physical properties of the BH + disk remnant, such as the mass and spin of the BH, the accretion rate, and the electromagnetic luminosity, are roughly independent of the initial B-field orientation. In addition, we find imposing symmetry across the orbital plane does not play a significant role in the final outcome of the mergers. Our results show that an incipient jet emerges only when the seed B-field has a sufficiently large-scale poloidal component aligned to $L$. The lifetime [$Δt\gtrsim 140(M_{NS}/1.625M_\odot)\rm ms$] and Poynting luminosities [$L_{EM}\simeq 10^{52}$erg/s] of the jet, when it forms, are consistent with typical short gamma-ray bursts, as well as with the Blandford--Znajek mechanism for launching jets.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.