Paper detail

Magnetocaloric performance of RE$_{11}$Co$_4$In$_9$ (RE = Tb, Er)

The magnetocaloric effect in RE$_{11}$Co$_4$In$_9$ (RE = Tb, Er) has been studied by means of magnetometric measurements in the function of temperature and applied magnetic field. The maximum magnetic entropy change ($-ΔS_{\mathrm{M}}^{\mathrm{max}}$) at magnetic flux density change ($Δμ_{0}H$) 0-9 T has been determined to be 5.51 J$\cdot$kg$^{-1}\cdot$K$^{-1}$ at 47.4 K for Tb$_{11}$Co$_4$In$_9$ and 14.28 J$\cdot$kg$^{-1}\cdot$K$^{-1}$ at 12.3 K for Er$_{11}$Co$_4$In$_9$, while temperature averaged entropy change (TEC) with 3 K span equals 5.50 and 14.14 J$\cdot$kg$^{-1}\cdot$K$^{-1}$ for RE = Tb and Er, respectively. The relative cooling power (RCP) and refrigerant capacity (RC) equal respectively 522.1 and 391.2 J$\cdot$kg$^{-1}$ in Tb$_{11}$Co$_4$In$_9$ and 605.2 and 463.1 J$\cdot$kg$^{-1}$ in Er$_{11}$Co$_4$In$_9$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.