Paper detail

Magnetization, magnetostriction, and their relationship in Invar Fe$_{1-x}A_{x}$ ($A={\rm Pt},{\rm Ni}$)

A method is proposed for investigating the spontaneous magnetization, the spontaneous volume magnetostriction, and their relationship in disordered face-centered-cubic Fe$_{0.72}$Pt$_{0.28}$ and Fe$_{0.65}$Ni$_{0.35}$ in the temperature interval $0 \leq T/T_{\rm C} < 1$. It relies on the disordered local moment formalism and the observation that the reduced magnetization in each of the investigated materials is accurately described by an equation of the form $M(T)/M(0) = [ 1 -s (T/T_{\rm C})^{3/2}- (1-s)(T/T_{\rm C})^{p} ]^{q}$. The present approach yields interesting results. The alloys at zero Kelvin share several physical properties: the volume in a partially disordered local moment state shrinks as the fraction of Fe moments which point down increases in the interval $0 < x^{{\rm Fe}\downarrow} < 1/2$, following closely $V(0) - 4 [V(0)-V(1/2)] x^{{\rm Fe}\downarrow} (1-x^{{\rm Fe}\downarrow})$, while the magnetization collapses, following closely $M(0) - 2 M(0) x^{{\rm Fe}\downarrow}$; the volume in the homogeneous ferromagnetic state greatly exceeds that in the disordered local moment state; $x^{{\rm Fe}\downarrow}(0)$ is close to zero. These common properties can account for a variety of intriguing phenomena displayed by both alloys, including the anomaly in the magnetostriction at zero Kelvin and, more surprisingly perhaps, the scaling between the reduced magnetostriction and the reduced magnetization squared below the Curie temperature. However, the thermal evolution of the fraction of Fe moments which point down depends strongly on the alloy under consideration. This, in turn, can explain the observed marked difference in the temperature dependence of the reduced magnetization between the two alloys.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.