Paper detail

Magnetic turbulence in the plasma sheet

Small-scale magnetic turbulence observed by the Cluster spacecraft in the plasma sheet is investigated by means of a wavelet estimator suitable for detecting distinct scaling characteristics even in noisy measurements. The spectral estimators used for this purpose are affected by a frequency dependent bias. The variances of the wavelet coefficients, however, match the power-law shaped spectra, which makes the wavelet estimator essentially unbiased. These scaling characteristics of the magnetic field data appear to be essentially non-steady and intermittent. The scaling properties of bursty bulk flow (BBF) and non-BBF associated magnetic fluctuations are analysed with the aim of understanding processes of energy transfer between scales. Small-scale ($\sim 0.08-0.3$ s) magnetic fluctuations having the same scaling index $α\sim 2.6$ as the large-scale ($\sim 0.7-5$ s) magnetic fluctuations occur during BBF-associated periods. During non-BBF associated periods the energy transfer to small scales is absent, and the large-scale scaling index $α\sim 1.7$ is closer to Kraichnan or Iroshnikov-Kraichnan scalings. The anisotropy characteristics of magnetic fluctuations show both scale-dependent and scale-independent behavior. The former can be partly explained in terms of the Goldreich-Sridhar model of MHD turbulence, which leads to the picture of Alfvénic turbulence parallel and of eddy turbulence perpendicular to the mean magnetic field direction. Nonetheless, other physical mechanisms, such as transverse magnetic structures, velocity shears, or boundary effects can contribute to the anisotropy characteristics of plasma sheet turbulence. The scale-independent features are related to anisotropy characteristics which occur during a period of magnetic reconnection and fast tailward flow.

preprint2004arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.