Paper detail

Magnetic response of metallic nanoparticles: Geometric and weakly relativistic effects

While the large paramagnetic response measured in certain ensembles of metallic nanoparticles has been assigned to orbital effects of conduction electrons, the spin-orbit coupling has been pointed out as a possible origin of the anomalously large diamagnetic response observed in other cases. Such a relativistic effect, arising from the inhomogeneous electrostatic potential seen by the conduction electrons, might originate from the host ionic lattice, impurities, or the self-consistent confining potential. Here we theoretically investigate the effect of the spin-orbit coupling arising from the confining potential, quantifying its contribution to the zero-field magnetic susceptibility and gauging it against the ones generated by other weakly-relativistic corrections. Two ideal geometries are considered in detail, the sphere and the half-sphere, focusing on the expected increased role of the spin-orbit coupling upon a symmetry reduction, and the application of these results to actual metallic nanoparticles is discussed. The matrix elements of the different weakly-relativistic corrections are obtained and incorporated in a perturbative treatment of the magnetic field, leading to tractable semi-analytical and semiclassical expressions for the case of the sphere, while a numerical treatment becomes necessary for the half-sphere. The correction to the zero-field susceptibility arising from the spin-orbit coupling in a single sphere is quite small, and it is dominated by the weakly-relativistic kinetic energy correction, which in turn remains considerably smaller than the typical values of the nonrelativistic zero-field susceptibility. Moreover, the spin-orbit contribution to the average response for ensembles of nanoparticles with a large size dispersion is shown to vanish. The symmetry reduction in going from the single sphere to the half-sphere does not translate into a significant (...)

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.