Paper detail

Magnetic penetration depth and vortex structure in anharmonic superconducting junctions with an interfacial pair breaking

The penetration depth l_j in superconducting junctions is identified within the Ginzburg-Landau theory as a function of the interfacial pair breaking, of the magnetic field and of the Josephson coupling strength. When the interfacial pair breaking goes up, l_j increases and an applicability of the local Josephson electrodynamics to junctions with a strong Josephson coupling is extended. In the junctions with strongly anharmonic current-phase relations, the magnetic field dependence of l_j is shown to lead to a significant difference between the weak-field penetration depth and the characteristic size of the Josephson vortex. For such junctions a nonmonotonic dependence of l_j and of the lower critical field on the Josephson coupling constant is found, and the specific features of spatial profiles of the supercurrent and the magnetic field in the Josephson vortex are established.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.